In corporate land, this is the pattern:
- Someone writes a script that reads like a blog post.
- They send it over with a note: “Here’s the video.”
- The script is treated as sacred text.
- Then we discover it’s 90 seconds long… for a 30-second video… with no thought about what we’re actually going to show.
So the “video” isn’t a video yet. It’s an essay.
If you work in production, you already know the next part: you spend your time rewriting, cutting, reshaping, and trying to turn dense paragraphs into something that works as voiceover and visuals. You’re not just polishing; you’re fundamentally rebuilding.
That’s the difference between content-first and video-first.
A video-first mentality doesn’t start with “What do we want to say?”
It starts with: “What are we going to show, and how will people experience this?”
Video is Not “Words with B-Roll”
A lot of internal teams think:
Step 1: Write all the things we want to say.
Step 2: Read it as voiceover.
Step 3: Throw visuals behind it.
That’s how you get:
- Wall-to-wall voiceover with no breathing room
- B-roll that feels generic or random
- On-screen text that repeats exactly what’s being said
- Videos that exhaust people instead of engaging them
Video is a visual medium with sound, not a podcast with stock footage.
A video-first approach flips the order:
- What does the audience need to understand or feel?
- What can we show to make that land fast?
- What words actually need to be spoken… and what can be left to visuals, text, or silence?
Once you do that, the script stops being a wall of text and becomes a plan for an experience.
The Script Is a Blueprint, Not a Stone Tablet
Treating the first script draft as “locked” is one of the fastest ways to kill a video.
Text-first scripts usually:
- Ignore timing (120+ words for a “quick 30-second video”)
- Use complex sentence structures that are fine to read but awkward to hear
- Try to include every talking point instead of one clear message
- Forget where emphasis, pauses, and visuals will carry meaning
A video-ready script is different. It’s built to:
- Be spoken naturally at a realistic pace (about 130–150 words per minute for VO)
- Leave space for visual beats, reactions, and transitions
- Support what’s on screen instead of compete with it
- Hit one main idea clearly, with maybe 2–3 supporting points
So when someone sends you a dense script and expects it to “just work,” what you’re actually doing is translating from document language to screen language.
That translation should be the plan from the start, not an emergency fix at the end.
Start With the Pictures, Not the Paragraphs
Here’s a simple way to force a video-first mindset.
Before anyone writes a “final” script, answer:
- What do we want the viewer to see in the first 3 seconds?
A person? A problem? A product in action? A visual metaphor? - What’s the journey on screen?
- Start: Hook or problem
- Middle: How we help / what it looks like in real life
- End: Result and what the viewer should do next
- Where does the audience need clarity vs emotion?
- Clarity: Diagrams, UI demos, steps, numbers
- Emotion: Faces, reactions, environments, real interactions
Once you have that, then you write voiceover to:
- Fill gaps the visuals can’t do alone
- Provide context, transitions, and emphasis
- Guide attention, not smother it
You can literally sketch this as a quick shot list or three-column layout:
| Time | Visual | VO / On-screen text |
|---|---|---|
| 0–3s | Close-up of customer struggling with X | “When your team is juggling calls, chats, and emails…” |
| 4–8s | Wide shot of solution in action | “You need one place where everything comes together.” |
| 9–15s | Screen capture / product demo | Short, clear line describing the outcome, not the feature list |
Once the visuals are clear, writing becomes much faster and cleaner.
Writing for Voiceover Is Not the Same as Writing an Email
A lot of “scripts” fail because they’re written like memos.
Spoken words need to:
- Be shorter
- Use simpler sentence structures
- Repeat key ideas more than fancy synonyms
- Sound like a human, not a PDF
Examples:
- Email style:“Our platform enables organizations to leverage a unified communications infrastructure to streamline workflows and improve customer satisfaction.”
- VO style:“Our platform brings your calls, messages, and video into one place, so your team works faster and your customers get help sooner.”
Same idea. One is for reading at a desk. The other is for listening while focusing on visuals.
A video-first mentality assumes someone is watching, not studying.
How to Shift Stakeholders Into a Video-First Mindset (Without Starting a War)
You’re often the translator between “We wrote the script” and “We’re making a watchable video.”
Here are some gentle ways to guide people:
1. Talk in terms of outcomes, not ego
Instead of:
“This script won’t work for video.”
Try:
“If we run this as-is, the video will be about 90 seconds and overloaded with voiceover. If we trim and write for screen, we can keep it under 45 seconds and make the key message much clearer.”
You’re not attacking their writing. You’re optimizing performance.
2. Introduce the idea of a “visual pass”
Make it normal that every script has two passes:
- Content pass: Are all the ideas right? Are we aligned on the message?
- Visual pass: How will this play as a video? Where are the visuals, pauses, and emphasis?
The “visual pass” is where you get permission to reshape copy, cut lines, and re-order for timing.
3. Use timing as a reality check
Take their draft, do a quick read aloud, and time it.
Then say something like:
“This is about 75 seconds of VO as written. For social, we’re aiming for 30–45 seconds. Let’s decide what’s truly essential on screen so we don’t lose people.”
Once people see the math, they understand why script surgery is not optional.
4. Show a before/after
Nothing sells video-first thinking like comparison.
- Take a project where you had to heavily rewrite.
- Show 15–20 seconds of the “original” script as a rough version (or just read it).
- Then show the final cut with tightened VO and purposeful visuals.
Call out what changed:
- Less VO
- More time to absorb visuals
- Clearer main idea
- Stronger emotional or practical hook
Suddenly, “Can we just read what we wrote?” stops sounding like a good plan.
Video-First is Audience-First
At the end of the day, this isn’t about protecting your creative process. It’s about respecting the viewer’s time and attention.
A content-first mindset says:
“We have a lot to say. How do we fit it all in?”
A video-first mindset says:
“Our viewer will give us 30–60 seconds. What’s the most powerful way to show and say what matters?”
When you start from what people see, feel, and remember, the script becomes a tool—not a constraint. The work you’re already doing—rewriting for VO, trimming for time, thinking about shots—isn’t “fixing” the video.
That is the work of making the video.
And the more your collaborators understand that, the more your scripts will arrive already thinking in frames, not paragraphs.
Leave a comment